Key points
- Newly unsealed court documents in the Blake Lively–Justin Baldoni dispute include texts between Blake Lively and Taylor Swift; one exchange reportedly contains a sharp insult directed at Baldoni.
- Actress Jenny Slate’s comments in depositions describe the It Ends With Us shoot as “gross and disturbing,” adding weight to on-set complaints in Lively’s lawsuit.
- Lively sued Baldoni in late 2024 alleging sexual harassment and retaliation; Baldoni filed a countersuit that was later dismissed — the legal battle continues into a May 2026 trial.
- Taylor Swift’s representatives say Swift had no creative role beyond licensing a song; the texts do not, according to Swift’s camp, show formal involvement in the film’s production.
What the documents say, (What Taylor Swift Texts with Blake Lively Reveal)
Court filings unsealed this week include text-message threads between Blake Lively and Taylor Swift that circulated during the film’s controversy.
Reporting says one message from Swift used an expletive to describe director Justin Baldoni — a line Baldoni’s team highlighted in filings.
Jenny Slate’s deposition — a blunt on-set account
Actress Jenny Slate told investigators she found aspects of the shoot “gross and disturbing,” and described behavior by Baldoni she deemed unprofessional.
Slate’s remarks appear in deposition excerpts cited by multiple outlets and are now part of the public record in the suit.
Why Swift’s texts matter (and what they don’t prove)
The texts show private reactions and friendly counsel between two high-profile friends — not, on their face, proof of a coordinated media campaign.
Swift’s team has insisted she was not creatively involved in It Ends With Us beyond one licensed song; Lively’s lawyers say the texts were casual responses between friends.
The legal context in short
Blake Lively filed a civil suit in late 2024 alleging harassment and retaliation; Baldoni countered with a high-value countersuit that was dismissed.
Both sides are offering witness testimony and documents; unsealed messages now shape how the public and jurors see interpersonal dynamics around the production.
What journalists should watch next
Key items: full deposition transcripts (Jenny Slate and other cast members), any motion to seal or reseal sensitive messages, and pretrial filings that define what the jury will see.
Also watch official statements from Swift, Lively, Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios as the legal record expands before the May 2026 trial.
Reporting responsibly — what to avoid repeating
Treat text snippets as context, not verdict: private messages show tone and sentiment but do not, alone, establish legal liability.
Avoid amplifying unverified gossip about relationships or motives; rely on court filings, sworn testimony and official statements.
Quick FAQ — short answers readers want
Did Taylor Swift direct or produce the film?
No — reporting and Swift’s reps say she licensed a song and was not involved in the film’s creative production.
Are the texts proof of a smear campaign?
Not by themselves — defenders of Lively say the messages are private exchanges; Baldwin’s team has used them to allege coordination. The court will weigh relevance.
Is Jenny Slate accusing Baldoni of a crime?
Slate’s deposition describes disturbing conduct and strong criticism of Baldoni’s behavior; whether statements substantiate criminal or civil claims is for prosecutors and the civil court to determine.
Do unsealed celebrity texts belong in public court records?
Final take
Unsealed texts and depositions make headlines because they offer texture and tone — but courts distinguish private snark from legally material conduct.
As the May 2026 trial approaches, expect more documents, sworn testimony and legal argument to replace gossip with adjudicated facts.
Disclaimer: This article summarizes reporting and unsealed court documents available as of January 2026 and attributes claims to the parties and public filings. It is informational and not an assertion of legal guilt. Readers should consult primary court filings for full context.